Several documents, one story: the disagreement surfaces itself
When your documents tell the same story differently, the assistant reads them TOGETHER - and tells you, in answer, where the versions disagree. A person decides what the honest version is. Request a demo.
The answer that admits the conflict
Ask about a process two documents describe differently: the reply comes built on BOTH - with the disagreement marked, in answer, instead of a confident version that silently picked one. The reader sees which document said what: you can verify every sentence.
A person writes the final word
The machine proposes the combined page; the disagreements are flagged for a person; and nothing lands in the knowledge base without the approval. The proposal arrives as a preview (what you read = what would be written); the approved version carries its sources. The model never ships by itself - the human does.
The machine's housekeeping
The synthesis runs on a budget the operator sets: it cannot quietly outspend its configuration; a crashed attempt never masquerades as work in progress - the reaper marks it done. The platform's housekeeping = your office's peace of mind.
See it live
Richiedi una dimostrazione - bring the two documents that disagree in your office and watch the disagreement present itself:
- Request a demo
- The operator guide(/en/docs/synthesis-pipeline)
- The engineering deep dive(/en/blog/synthesis-pipeline-design)
Facts in this post - FACT-CENSUS row F-SYNTH-1 (cited in the plan). Provenance: the product docs at v0.28.1.
